|


|
|
Mold Filling Analyses
Through mold filling analyses, costly design errors in the development
of injection molded parts and injection molds can be identified in advance and avoided. Such errors
otherwise could be corrected only by expensive and time-consuming alterations to the mold. Ticona has
the capabilities to run basic filling and packing analyses, as well as more advanced cooling and shrinkage/warpage
analyses.
Required Information: - Part
geometry
- Material rheological data
- Processing
data
Outputs: - Filling
pattern
- Pressure distribution
- Temperature
distribution
- Shear stress, weld line locations, etc.
Tips on when to use a mold filling analysis - Mold
filling analyses are common in the plastic injection molding industry today. The key to attaining the
most value from a mold filling analysis is to understand what you are trying to solve and how the analysis
can help achieve that.
Good reasons:
- To determine whether a part will fill or not. The analysis
can also provide other useful information such as the required injection pressure and clamp tonnage.
- To
determine if the part will have any filling problems. Many filling problems, such as short-shots, air-traps,
and unbalanced fill, can be identified by examining the filling pattern. A mold filling analysis
allows you to vary the gate location, injection speed, and other processing conditions to determine
whether these problems can be improved or corrected.
- To predict
how a part will warp. The absolute values predicted by a warpage analysis must be used very cautiously.
Warpage predictions are best used to compare gate locations, wall thickness changes, and/or
design variations.
- To troubleshoot a bad prototype
tool. The best method for troubleshooting a tool problem is to perform a “short-shot” study using
the prototype tool. Mold filling analyses can be used to determine which changes will be effective
and are quicker and less expensive than cutting steel.
- To
determine the effectiveness of the cooling circuits. A cooling analysis can be added to a warpage
analysis for additional accuracy. Since the cooling lines are typically very difficult to change once
they have been cut into the tool, this type of analysis is most useful before a tool is built.
- To
fix weld line problems. A mold filling analysis will predict where the weld lines will occur and
can help determine how to move them to a less problematic area. It can also provide some hints about
the quality of the weld line such as the temperature of the material when the flow fronts meet and the
pressure available to pack out the weld line. It cannot, however, determine how strong or visible
a weld line will be.
Poor reasons:
- To predict surface defects. Unfortunately, most
surface defects, such as splay, delamination, burns, and sink-marks, cannot be determined from a mold
filling analysis. In many cases, however, an analysis of the filling pattern may provide clues
to the cause of a surface defect.
- To cut a tool in order
to produce a flat part. Warpage analysis results may not be accurate enough for cutting
steel. Since the outputs of the filling and packing analyses are used as inputs to the warpage
analysis, any errors are additive. The results can be used with more confidence if prior work
on similar parts confirms that the actual part shrinkage matches the amount predicted by the software.
The best way to determine the amount of warpage is by measuring the prototype tool and parts.
|
|
|